
What is the function of taking seemingly absolutist stances? Can anyone actually make their mind and heart hard as a diamond?
I'm thinking a lot about absolutes. I'm thinking.
Recent accusations suggest that I have been too absolute in my beliefs. Or, rather, lack of beliefs. Can you be absolute in lacking? Was it Deleuze that wrote on "lacking"?
What a strange word.
So here it is: if I consider my position on the big issues- love, faith (another type of love), potential, possibility, futurity... I can confess a lack of belief. It's not something I am proud of, I want to believe in these things.
To be clear, my desire to believe translates into total respect and admiration for people who do believe. Truly. To be a believer is seems to be open-hearted, seems to be trusting and with grace.
I offer to my accuser the position that to be a non-believer is not the absolutist stance it seems to be. Maybe this is a point of view I would hold alone.
For me, the lack of belief functions as a porous state of total openness. An acceptance of the ambiguities, a listening ear for the discordancies, inconsistencies, intricacies that make the totality of living so very fascinating.
To choose one way to think or believe, as a method of defining self and the self's relation to the world seems infinitely more absolute to me than my position.
I am totally enthralled with the idea that life is governed by chance, without pattern or over-arching meaning beyond the moment. This is a difficult position to maintain, I'll be the first to admit, as I occasionally fall into apophenia, thinking that surely all things are connected. I hear over and over again that life without pattern or symbolism is life without meaning. I disagree.
I was thinking symbolism and connectivity might be the opposite of paranoia, but the opposite is actually pronoia. Both noia's rely on the observer's self-focused world view. Either the world conspires against you or for you.
But apophenia, I think, lends itself better to the idea that you are witnessing the machinations of the clockwork universe (and it has a plan). Admittedly, I have never felt like I was at the center of some universal plot.
Sometimes I come across research that suggests the mind isn't built to function without a sense of connectivity. That the mind is built to "establish a point of order in what seems like a random system of information." That it is cognitively challenging, or impossible, or ill-advised, to exist in a position of non-differentiation. That is, the mind needs to believe there is some sort of plan.
Today I don't think there's a plan.
Last year (and the year before, and the year before) I was researching magical thinking and romantic delusion, and it's so strange how often I end up right back in it. It's inescapable. Is there an inherent pattern in that? Is something important trying to reveal itself, or am I just retreading, annually, these ideas?
To consider absolutism and a lack of belief in the context of delusion and magical thinking is an even more interesting proposition than trying to prove the value of my personal porousness! Think of how you thought as a child. (Most magical thinking research seems to be focused on early childhood development and schizophrenics.) Think of all the systems you invented to explain how the world was, with the little information you had as a child.
Couldn't sleep without the blankie or the the toy.
Santa Claus, Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy.
Making wishes in fountains, with birthday candles, and wishbones.
Imaginary friends, object permanence, fairy tales, curses, jinxes, bogey men.
Your whole perception of cause and effect is skewed by lack of information, and need to make sense of everything around you. That way of thinking doesn't necessarily cease just for aging, there are still systems beyond control that you generate meaning for, for lack of information. Love, faith, and futurity are huge unknowable systems we tangle with every day, with so many variables and unknowables we have to create some concrete worldview to define them and contain them for us, to define our relationship to and function in them.
I am always looking for ways that magical thinking is manifesting around me, and in me. Things that aren't understood, things beyond control. Who isn't always trying to create some system of relevance just to get through the day?
So, to come full circle, how does a lack of belief relate to all this? When I am being very generous with myself, I imagine that a lack of belief is an acceptance of the lack of knowledge, acceptance of my incapability to control things that no one can control. I don't know where or if god lives. I don't know perfect love, probably never have, maybe never will. I don't know what the future will bring, or that it will be good, that things will work out.
When I am being very cruel to myself I think, too, that the lack of belief might be too absolute, and a natural outgrowth of some self-loathing, or self-destructive desire to stop moving forward, or to exist in a state of exception.
But mostly I think it is a desire to not be tied to a world view so concrete. As previously stated, most belief systems seem to me more absolute than a lack of belief.
The porousness of my position is the most absolute position I have.
To restate, however, I have nothing but the utmost respect for believers, only a mild jealousy for the grace and faith they are capable of.
But this isn't some manifesto, it's a clarifying defense.